Talk:Coolship

Surface to mass
Shouldn't that be 'surface to volume'? It's that term which is used most commonly in the sciences. One reason is that mass depends on density while surface area and volume are both directly proportional to length (and have units of length^2 and length^3, respectively). Unless 'surface to mass' is a term from brewing terminology, it ought to be changed.40.142.183.146 (talk) 14:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The existing source no longer links to relevant material and what you're saying makes sense to me. I will edit the article if there are no objections. Tammbeck talk  14:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)