Talk:Cornelius Gallus

Merge needed
There is another article of this very person:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaius_Cornelius_Gallus

Chris Weimer 08:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Merged.--Aldux 11:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Cornelius Gallus and His Place of Birth
''Cornelius Gallus. . . was born of humble parents at Forum Julii (Fréjus) in Gaul.''

It should be noted that R. Syme was first to suggest Fréjus as the likely birthplace of Cornelius Gallus in a 1938 article, "The Origin of Cornelius Gallus," CQ 32.39-44, and that his speculation was at least initially based on Jerome's statement that Gallus was a Foroiuliensis. In 1963, however, F. Magi published a recently discovered epigraph, showing that Gallus, under the title of Octavian's praefectus fabrum, had established a Forum Iulii in Egypt. [Magi, F. (1963) "Le iscrizioni recentemente scoperte sull' obelisco Vaticano," Studi Romani 11.50-6. See, also, Salvaterra, C. (1987) "Forum Iulium nell' iscrizione di C. Cornelio Gallo sull' obelisco Vaticano," Aegyptus 67.171-81; Manzoni, G. E. (1995) ''Foroiuliensis poeta. Vita e poesia di Cornelio Gallo. Milan.] The epigraphic evidence suggests that Jerome had confused Gallus' birthplace with the Forum Iulii'', which Gallus had himself established in Egypt. As a consequence, Syme's hypothesis that Fréjus was the birthplace of Cornelius Gallus is no longer sustainable. It should be noted also that any mention of any Forum Iulii at the time of Gallus' birth would actually be anachronistic, since the term had not come into use until 60 BC. This does not, however, exclude the possibility that a Forum Iulii would have replaced an older location's name, as Manzoni has shown in the article stated above. But, to date, we have no conclusive evidence telling us where Cornelius Gallus was born.

Mfletcher7202 (talk) 06:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * This should probably be given more careful citation in the actual article, since the reiteration of Syme's argument is handy online in The Roman Revolution, and the JRS article referenced is not. More important, that article doesn't seem to be the source of the claim that Gallus was born at Forum Livii, so what is? Anderson et al. say: "The new community of Forum Iuli (Fréjus) belongs to this period [the 40s], though the colonia may have been founded a decade later by Octavian; as Gallus himself came from the district (Jerome misleadingly calls him 'Foroiuliensis'), his local knowledge and influence would have been invaluable." They also seem to suggest that the inscription could refer to Forum Iuli back in Gaul, or simultaneously to that work and an Augustan founding in the East.
 * I'm also unclear as to why it would be strange to name a new foundation after your birthplace (if we're possibly talking about two places with the same name, one West and one East), especially in honor of someone who aspired to be an Alexander (plenty of places named for him); that kind of naming happened all the time when Europeans came to the "New World."
 * As for the foundation date of Fréjus (the name Forum Iuli in 60 sounds too early, since Caesar wasn't even proconsul there till 58), it was not unusual for the Romans to take over a site or establish a colonia at a preexisting Gallic town, and to call that a founding; there was a long series of precedents in Cisalpina (starting with Senigallia) before the Narbonensis and later the rest of Transalpina. So Gallus could indeed have been born in a Gallic "district" that was only later refounded under a Roman name. At any rate, the Syme argument in the 1938 article doesn't seem incompatible with what's said in the JRS article (I have both of them in front of me), and it's hardly an "unsustainable" argument with the direct statement of Jerome to support it and "no conclusive evidence" to the contrary. The JRS authors, if I'm reading them right, don't think the inscription necessarily negates Syme's birthplace ID. Whatever the case, if the Italian scholarship above is the source for the birthplace, those works should be cited. Cynwolfe (talk) 02:49, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Macronisation
Latin has phonemic vowel length. This was depicted by the Apex in inscriptions, to differentiate between short and long vowels. Latin natives could omit the apex, because of their perfect fluency; this does not pertain to anybody reading the wikipedia article.

So please no edit wars and toddler temper tantrums. Macronisation helps to understand, read and pronounce Latin texts, so even Latin speakers used it (Apex). Those speaking Latin fluently can very well ignore it; but both macronization as well as distinction between U and V or I and J (which is, contrary to the Apex, NOT a part of antique inscriptions) is important for those speaking only a little Latin or learning it. --2003:C8:4746:E700:25F1:45B3:B39:4C01 (talk) 19:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)