Talk:Correctio filialis de haeresibus propagatis

Attention required
This article is Filial has been added to several Catholicism related templates. The article is of little notability, (the topic is a statement issued by a few critics of the pope that has received little coverage, nor a response from the church), and is of poor quality (for instance describing the head of the SSPX as a "Novus Ordo" scholar). It is and inappropriate for high-level navigation templates, and requires considerable work to assert notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zfish118 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , I've removed the term novus ordo scholar, as 1) Novus ordo is a loaded phrase 2) National Catholic Register never described them as scholars of the Mass of Paul VI so it was unsourced (I'm also not sure where I would put National Catholic Register on the reliable source scale).Other concerns I have are the claim this is the first filial correction since 1333. That's a very strong claim and one we'd need more than the Register or the document itself for it to be included. Part of the reason it might be the first since... is because the phrase is rarely if ever used. I'm sure the events surrounding the Western Schism, Council of Basel, and Council of Constance could arguably be classified in a similar way if scholarly works used the term (which they don't). I'll post on BLPN because I think its a good idea to get eyes outside of the Catholicism WikiProject on this. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the second set of eyes! I mistakenly thought this had been spammed to several articles based on the "What links here report", and that attention would be required to clean that up. It was only the transcribed link from its addition to template:Catholicism, which I already removed, however.  While the article clearly has issues, they are not urgent. –Zfish118⋉talk 06:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I removed Category:Apostolic exhortations, as the statement was not issue by the pope, but to the pope. –Zfish118⋉talk 20:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Article's subject seems easily to pass muster according to guideline wp:GNG. (See, e.g.):
 * 1) Catholic News Agency
 * 2) Catholic News Service
 * 3) Nat'l Catholic Register
 * 4) Nat'l (R.)C. Reporter
 * 5) Catholic Herald
 * 6) ChurchMilitant
 * 7) Christianity Today
 * 8) DailyBeast
 * 9) 1st Things
 * 10) Patheos
 * 11) Assoc. Press
 * 12) CNN --Hodgdon&#39;s secret garden (talk) 23:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)