Talk:Corruption in Thailand

[Untitled]
Regarding the unsourced entry implicating Yingluck, it is dishonest to include this without mentioning the questionable nature of the corruption commision of Thailand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.40.60.69 (talk) 10:29, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Recentism and POV
I would like to point out obvious problems of this article including:
 * 1) The article is bias in favor of the current junta because it only mentions actions on corruption but says nothing on the corruption allegation on the current junta itself
 * 2) It also does not mention past government's corruption, both civilian and military. History might be included as well since corruption has always been one of the rationale to launch a coup in Thailand.
 * 3) Multiple sections could be created such as voting fraud, abuse of power, etc. --Horus (talk) 17:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Ive made some changes that have addressed the huge bias in favor of the NCPO that there was before. I still feel that the article needs a bit more work though before the neutrality tag can be removed. Wikiman5676 (talk) 02:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I have removed the neutrality tag, as the article has been significantly changed to address that issue since. Wikiman5676 (talk) 03:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)