Talk:Cosmic Call

"The messages are designed with noise resistant format and characters, which make it resistant to alteration by noise." - Redundant phrasing is redundant? Or am I missing some small distinction between the meaning of the former and latter parts of the sentence? Metasyntactic D (talk) 02:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks like it was translated from Russian. Kortoso (talk) 16:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Cosmic Call. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090515102750/http://cs.astronomy.com:80/asycs/forums/p/17428/295175.aspx to http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/p/17428/295175.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Confirm target stars CC1, CC2; discrepancy
Greetings, I've noticed page four in this document (https://www.plover.com/misc/Dumas-Dutil/messages.pdf -- linked to in this article as the "Dutil-Dumas Message") lists several different star targets for the 1999 and 2003 cosmic calls (Cosmic Call 1 and Cosmic Call 2, respectively) than this source (http://www.cplire.ru/rus/ra&sr/VAK-2004.html) that's cited in this article. I say this taking into consideration the difference between the HD and Hip cataloging. May be worth looking at for someone knowledgeable in this topic. Joeparsec (talk) 04:01, 6 August 2018 (UTC)