Talk:Cougars (30 Rock)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
I do believe that this article is not British, so it would be a good idea to correctly spell "amoung" ---> "among" in the Reception section. Same section, "Matt Webb Mitovich of TV Guide wrote that this episode "had so many fun lines", and found himseld", if you read that sentence you might find something very odd.
Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Throughout the article, correctly link "Kevin Brown" and "Michael Scott" to their correspondence articles. In the lead, it would be best if "Val Emmich" was linked once.
Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Not much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think everything has been taken care of. Thanks for the review, Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 04:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, just doing my part. Thank you to Cornucopia for getting the stuff I left at the talkpage, cause I have gone off and passed the article to GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]