Talk:Council of Magickal Arts

This article was nominated for deletion on January 22, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

AdSpam/Delete/Etc conversation[edit]

This is NOT adspam for a commercial service. Spirit Haven, Inc. is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) religious organization, based in Texas. PLEASE see [1]

True, it is a stub (and is so marked!) and will take some work to bring it up to encyclopedic quality, but it is a start and no more. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. 03:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I just went to the page of the user that tagged this article as spam, and I see the user has been flagged as a possible sockpuppet. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. 03:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a sockpuppet of myself. It's a joke. Try some reading comprehension. Nardman1 03:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then in good faith I will assume you have some reading comprehension, and will remove the db-spam tag you put on this article. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. 03:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've started the afd process instead. Nardman1 04:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, FFS, why? Is it so hard for you to give me time to expand the article, attract editors, and develop the page to some degree of quality before you attack it? Or do you just object to all Neopagan articles no general principles? --Bill W. Smith, Jr. 04:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nardman1, please see WP:CIVIL and WP:BITE.

Bill, as soon as possible add something to the first sentence of this article stating why a non-believer would consider the Council "notable." In the future, when creating an article that you think may take some time — and especially if someone is likely to go on Crusade against it — you can develop the article as a subpage of your user page (e.g., [[User:BillWSmithJr/Council of Magickal Arts]]) and then move it into article-space once it is strong enough to survive. ➥the Epopt 04:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because this page is flagged for deletion, and I do not have time to trace down sources, I've changed the beginning to show "why CMA is notable". While it does not meet the requirements for an organization, the festivals do meet the criteria for notable events, and they don't have their own name - they are the CMA Beltain and CMA Samhain festivals. The festivals are larger and just as well known nationally as other festivals who's validity as stub entries is not under debate. I would have tried to track down sources before posting such information, but with the request for deletion hanging over the article, I thought it would be better to put the info in there and have someone add a "citation needed" note and prevent the article from being deleted. Dreamingkat 19:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

running out of time, but google books says that CMA is listed in the following books:

Encyclopedia of wicca and witchcraft By Raven Grimassi [2]
If You Want to Be a Witch: A Practical Introduction to the Craft By Edain McCoy [3]
The Sabbats: A Witch's Approach to Living the Old Ways By Edain McCoy [4]
Advanced Witchcraft: Go Deeper, Reach Further, Fly Higher By Edain McCoy [5] shows the link for CMA as being houston-pno.org - did CMA start the pagan night out stuff? that would make it a nationally worthy org.

Dreamingkat 19:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, unfortunately they did not start PNO... I did. Thank you VERY much for the book refs. Just got another one from a friend... "Dancing the Fire: A Guide to Neo-Pagan Festivals and Gatherings" by Marian Singer. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. (talk/contribs) 20:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's Start a Real Cleanup[edit]

Now that it looks like this article WILL survive, lets address some of the remaining complaints from the AfD.

Elaragirl said that it still feels "spammy". Can we identify the "spammy" parts and rewrite them?
We still need some more solid, reliable references.
We have several stub sections. These need to be filled out/expanded.

--Bill W. Smith, Jr. (talk/contribs) 16:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"spammy" tends to refer to phrases such as "the best" and other language that can be found on advertisements and brochures. Dreamingkat 06:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MUCH better citation[edit]

Thanks to some friends on several Pagan eLists, I finally found a better citation for CMA's notability and it was right under my nose. In Drawing Down the Moon, earlier in the same Resources chapter from the festival entries, Adler has a much more substantive paragraph describing CMA. I can include the paragraph in the reference if needed but I am lazy and not the fastest typist in the world :) --Bill W. Smith, Jr. (talk/contribs) 13:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google Books, and CoMA vs CotMA[edit]

If you search Google Books for "Council of Magickal Arts" you get 5 hits, but if you search for "Council of the Magickal Arts" you get 9 hits. Both are CMA, thus CMA has 14 gHits on Google Books! Yes, gHits are, by themselves, not notable. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. (talk/contribs) 14:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Membership Numbers[edit]

I think the membership numbers cited might be a tad inflated. Although I know there was recently debate that said that over a thousand people were at one of the events held before the land was bought, CMA doesn't currently have that many members. Dreamingkat 06:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The most recent festival, Beltaine 2007, had just over 600 attending. That would be 1200 annual attendees. Actual membership has always been between double and triple any single events attendance. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. (talk/contribs) 06:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cma logo.jpg[edit]

Image:Cma logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Council of Magickal Arts/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

As the author of this page, I simply set the class to Start. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. 05:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 05:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 12:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Suggested changes[edit]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The edit request was not specific.

The Wild Hunt reported on embezzlement of about half the organization's operating budget here: http://wildhunt.org/2016/09/embezzlement-saps-funds-from-the-council-of-magickal-arts.html

I recommend that this be appended to the history section. The reason I won't do so myself is because I am the reporter.--~T P W 17:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done You need to specify exactly what you want added to the article in a 'x to z' manner. st 170e 20:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Council of Magickal Arts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]