Talk:Couples Retreat

Vandalism
The producers, starring... is all messed up

All of the award portion seems to be made up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.35.153.10 (talk) 02:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Apostrophe
Another example of Hollywood English failure - should be 'Couples' Retreat.' Does this deserve a mention like 'Two Weeks [sic] Notice?' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.248.107.99 (talk) 01:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, you would need a source. However, before you go searching for sources, perhaps you should imagine some way in which this peeve of yours might be worth noting. 72.187.66.151 (talk) 00:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Source for what? The use of apostrophes for possession?94.193.134.98 (talk) 18:06, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

If you can find a critic who points out this grammar flaw while criticising the film that probably gives you enough of a source to include it in the article. The top critics list on the Rotten Tomatoes review list page for this film is probably the best place to start. -- Horkana (talk) 16:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Why does a critic need to point this out? Anyone who learnt English language at school should be able to pick up on this. 94.193.134.98 (talk) 16:48, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

I can't imagine Wikipedia requiring a source for a spelling error. However, there are bound to be plenty of online pages pointing this out. If you type in 'Couples Retreat movie apostrophe' in Google, you'll get lots of pages about it. To solve the mystery once and for all, the translated name (from non-English titles) means 'Island of the Couples', which would mean that the correct English title is: Couples' Retreat RdCrestdBreegull (talk) 03:09, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

201.19.91.94 added a whole BUNCH of false actors and producers to the credits. Someone please revert. 173.70.65.45 (talk) 23:13, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Rating Appeal
On a theater's website I saw this movie listed as "PG-13:On appeal for sexual content and language." What does this mean? IMDB seems to say that it was rated R but the rating was appealed? How does this work and is this common (as opposed to something noteworthy that should be in the article)? Ghan-buri-ghan (talk) 03:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)