Talk:Cozi Zuehlsdorff

17th birthday is 2015 August 03, per her Twitter
cozizuehlsdorff.com/
 * (which her Wikipedia article calls her official webpage)
 * links to
 * twitter.com/CoziZuehlsdorff

Tweets include
 * https://mobile.twitter.com/CoziZuehlsdorff/status/628422531809193985?p=v
 * https://mobile.twitter.com/CoziZuehlsdorff/status/628422637027504128?p=v
 * https://mobile.twitter.com/CoziZuehlsdorff/status/628455691854835712?p=v

So i'm quite sure she's 17, and pretty sure August 3 is her birthday.

Unrelated question--i see from the revision history why Cozi Zuehlsdorff is editprotected, and the "edit" link is accordingly absent from her article, but don't protected pages normally have a color-coded little lock symbol on them? Why not here?

Thanks.

--71.121.143.137 (talk) 04:38, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Added to article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 August 2015
https://mobile.twitter.com/CoziZuehlsdorff/status/628423270333714432?p=v indicates August 3 is her birthday. (As stated before, the Twitter account seems authentic.)

71.121.143.72 (talk) 04:54, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:02, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

official website is down?
Anyone else having trouble with cozizuehlsdorff.com? Should we remove it from the article or put a note on it?

71.121.143.36 (talk) 01:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I've marked it as a deadlink.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:29, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Linking dates
We used to link years and dates but that stopped and became strongly discouraged a few years ago. There are very few times were it is appropriate and only if there is a strong link to the subject of the article, not just to a list of similar things that happened in that year. See WP:DATELINK for more. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The edits in question not only essentially violate WP:OVERLINK, as you say – they also contain not-broken type edits which are of a "WP:IDONTLIKEIT" type and which are completely irrelevant, and should not be repeated once reverted. Quite simply, they are not article improvements. And now the editor in question is edit warring over them, and is likely to be blocked for disruption if they persist... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Name pronunciation
I think their should be a pronunciation put after her name because it's likely that her name is mispronounced a lot. CanadianAndNYer (talk) 01:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)