Talk:Criticism of the Walt Disney Company/Archives/2019

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 one external links on Criticism of The Walt Disney Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071226165400/http://www.catholicleague.org/release.php?id=381 to http://www.catholicleague.org/release.php?id=381
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071226165350/http://www.catholicleague.org/catalyst.php?year=1996&month=October&read=151 to http://www.catholicleague.org/catalyst.php?year=1996&month=October&read=151
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071226165355/http://www.catholicleague.org/catalyst.php?year=1997&month=October&read=414 to http://www.catholicleague.org/catalyst.php?year=1997&month=October&read=414
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science/06/30/coolsc.nemo.fish/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120522131657/http://www.gamepolitics.com/2011/12/22/who-supports-sopa-special-interests to http://www.gamepolitics.com/2011/12/22/who-supports-sopa-special-interests
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311001731/http://www.businessweek.com:80/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2004/nf2004129_4222_db035.htm to http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2004/nf2004129_4222_db035.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090421070416/http://www.saban.com/html/press/010723.html to http://www.saban.com/html/press/010723.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://archives.cnn.com/2000/LAW/08/11/disney.lawsuit.01/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071015072608/http://thestandard.com.hk:80/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=25410&sid=5401592&con_type=1&d_str=20051110&sear_year=2005 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=25410&sid=5401592&con_type=1&d_str=20051110&sear_year=2005

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Criticism of The Walt Disney Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2004/nf2004129_4222_db035.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930184230/http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/july01/july23/1_mon/news1monday.html to http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/july01/july23/1_mon/news1monday.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=25410&sid=5401592&con_type=1&d_str=20051110&sear_year=2005
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071130045308/http://science.monstersandcritics.com/news/article_1021460.php/Under-fire_Disney_takes_sharks_fin_off_menu_at_Hong_Kong_park_ to http://science.monstersandcritics.com/news/article_1021460.php/Under-fire_Disney_takes_sharks_fin_off_menu_at_Hong_Kong_park_

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Plagiarism
The section mentions the Pixar short "Play by Play". However, Pixar never produced a short with that title. Can someone figure out what is going on? --Numberguy6 (talk) 21:36, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It appears to be a reference to this film (without making any judgement on the veracity of these links/sources). Aoi (青い) (talk) 21:46, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello all. Just to give a courtesy heads up, on May 30 I edited and added to this "Plagiarism" section regarding the content on the "Lion King"/"Jungle Emperor/Kimba" controversy to clarify it a bit. The part I changed begins after the words: "The most notable and controversial example is The Lion King, which critics allege was plagiarized from Osamu Tezuka's Japanese manga" - -

(My changes begin here: "ジャングル大帝 "Janguru Taitei" i.e. "Jungle Emperor" 2(external link to "Jungle Emperor" page on Wikipedia Japan site) and its anime adaptation of the same name (in Japan). This TV series was in turn dubbed and retitled Kimba the White Lion for English-speaking audiences by Titan Productions for NBC from 1965 to 1966, and it premiered on Los Angeles' KHJ-TV in September 1966.[32] After Kimba's original run in the United States ended in the autumn of 1967, the series was shown in syndication on TV stations across the U.S. through September 30, 1978.[33]"). With the citations, I hope this is acceptable and self-explanatory. I strongly feel clarification on this topic and information is timely and especially critical at this point in light of the possibility of continued controversy with the July 19 release of the Lion King remake. This section as well as the Wikipedia page on "Kimba the White Lion" could possibly use even further clarification and explanation when possible. Thank you. 108.69.216.5 (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2019 (UTC) Mike P.