Talk:Croatia–Serbia relations

Request for comments
There is a request for comments that is likely of interest to this article at Talk:Rajka_Baković. --- Otr500 (talk) 16:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Croatia–Serbia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120504142243/http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/comexpert/ANX/IV.htm to http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/comexpert/anx/IV.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Croatia–Serbia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090916030858/http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005449 to http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005449
 * Added tag to http://www.mvpei.hr/CustomPages/Static/HRV/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Croatia–Serbia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080708160217/http://www.konzulat-srbije-rijeka.hr/index.php?strana=naslovne to http://www.konzulat-srbije-rijeka.hr/index.php?strana=naslovne

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

why is Serbo-Croatian/std in the lede?
This can-of-worms [as far as nationalists on Wiki] has nothing to do with the relations between these two countries. It looks tossed-in ... ? 50.111.60.40 (talk) 08:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)


 * It's interesting info that languages are mutually intelligible, though probably a bit of a flamebait. For example Denmark–Norway relations doesn't include such a thing, but Denmark–Sweden relations does. India–Pakistan relations mentions it later. Moving it out of the lead as it's non-summary info, and leaving in just a summary like in the DK-SE article, would probably be reasonable. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 10:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Background section POV issue
The background section looks like a series of talking points to compose a suspiciously negative narrative. It's quite suspect that the Croat-Serb Coalition, creation of Yugoslavia, or much of the history of SFR Yugoslavia is left out. It's so shoddy it doesn't even mention other somewhat negative stuff, like the Serb-Catholic movement in Dubrovnik, or Croatian Spring, probably other topics where there was notable interaction between the two countries. It needs a serious review. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 19:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Recentism with section #Relations since 2010?
The first time I had edited this article, it lacked any events between 2005 and 2020. Events from 2014 and 2018 have been added since then, but that's it. The rest of the section covers the last 3 years and it's probably going to grow, given that the article is receiving much more attention now than it did before. What do we do? –Vipz (talk) 10:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)


 * @Franjo Tahy: what do you think? –Vipz (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I already thought about this. I would set the main sections into centuries (20th and 21st) and their sub-sections into decades ('90s, '00s, '10s and '20s). We are currently writing new content under the sub-heading "Relations since 2010", while in reality we entered well into 2020's. Franjo Tahy (talk) 13:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @Vipz Franjo Tahy (talk) 13:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)