Talk:Cruentation

Untitled
I am not used to all of what wikipedia does, but I have noticed that this article is sort of below standards. It looks like it started out as a college paper, and has redundancy. I would not know how to go about fixing this, but I thought I could at least bring this up for someone who knows. --68.61.250.127 (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I agree with the above; it's largely because the 4th and 5th paragraph appear to be copied verbatim from reference [5]. Will attempt a re-write when I get a chance. 21:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC) EddyH — Preceding unsigned comment added by EddyH (talk • contribs)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cruentation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3AjAoSpp14TuEJ%3Awww.scribd.com%2Fdoc%2F1107265%2FNational-Institutes-of-Health-highlights%20ius%20cruentationis&cd=3&hl=nl&ct=clnk&gl=nl&source=www.google.nl
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100310102701/http://u0028844496.user.hosting-agency.de/malexwiki/index.php/Gottesurteil to http://u0028844496.user.hosting-agency.de/malexwiki/index.php/Gottesurteil

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:34, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Etymology?
What does/ do the older latin name/s mean in translation, etc.? An 'Etymology' chapter or at least paragraph is really, really missing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3037:409:47F6:1:1:965A:3A2C (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)