Talk:Crusader Gold

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.davidgibbins.com/books.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Pesky ( talk  …stalk!) 16:11, 11 October 2011 (UTC) Entire p[lot summary a copyright violation. Pesky ( talk  …stalk!) 16:11, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Administrator: please note that I have now written a new version of the plot summary of this novel, to address the issue of similarity to the plot summary on davidgibbins.com and possible copyright infringement. I have also written this new version in a more encyclopaedic tone. Thanks! Curwen Littledale — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curwen Littledale (talk • contribs) 16:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you. :) I've been able to incorporate some of it, but the beginning still followed a bit too closely on the source. It is hard to write a "clean" plot summary when following somebody else's, as you are almost forced to choose the same events to highlight. When writing our own summary, we are likely to focus on different details.


 * It would be a good idea to add more encyclopedic content to the article in general. While book summaries are typically fair use when in context of critical discussion of a work, they really do need more supporting analysis to be used transformatively. It would be helpful to incorporate references to critical response to the work or the history of publication or other details. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:19, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much. I will follow your advice on this and any other plot summaries of books. I will also look to adding more encyclopedic content as you suggest. Many thanks again. -- Curwen Littledale (talk • contribs) 8:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)