Talk:Cyclone Namu

SI importance
Does anyone know of a way to make the SI importance to be Top?Jason Rees (talk) 18:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's possible. Sorry JR. YE Pacific  Hurricane 18:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Its been added in now.Jason Rees (talk) 10:29, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Plan of action
As time and my motivation allows, I am going to try and sort this article out in order to try and tell the story of Namu a lot clearer than the article does presently. My working suspicion is that each of the nine provinces with the exception of Temotu will deserve a paragraph each and one for the overall impact. The aftermath section will also be about 3-4 paragraphs long. If anyone has any thoughts on the structure let me know, I am very keen to hear in particular to hear from .Jason Rees (talk) 14:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * An 11 month late reply (I was looking at my older articles and stumbled across this), but knowing you, you'll eventually come back to this, it's probably a good idea, but I assume in addition to the nine paragraphs about impact you mentioned above, you'd also keep the paragraphs with the TC warnings and the one with rain/wind totals. YE Pacific  Hurricane 23:32, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Cyclone Namu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pacificdisaster.net/pdnadmin/data/original/SLB_Nat_Disasters_v1_1992_s.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 10:54, 4 July 2016 (UTC)