Talk:Cyclotron/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Atavoidturk (talk · contribs) 17:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Copyright tags on images
Thanks for doing the review on this article, Atavoidturk - I was beginning to wonder if this was going to make it to the top of the "oldest unreviewed" list. However, I'm sorry, but I can't figure out which images have issues. All of the images are marked as either public domain or Creative Commons licensed. What exactly needs to be done here? Thanks! PianoDan (talk) 06:51, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Update - I think I figured out which image was causing problems. Removed it and replaced it with another one which should be OK. PianoDan (talk) 07:36, 5 June 2022 (UTC)