Talk:Daclatasvir

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ellenyunac, Jennatlam, Littlemeow, Huntbryanm. Peer reviewers: Dmochizuki, Ktakamura, Lcsmith1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Classified as Stub
No side effects, interactions and contraindications sections... This does not qualify as Start. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 08:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Revisions
I fixed stuff that got messed up. Poor sourcing (not WP:MEDRS). Wrong sections per WP:MEDMOS. Bad formatting. Badly formatted citations. Please see WP:MEDHOWJytdog (talk) 06:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review: Group 7

Question 1 (Dylan): Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? If not, specify…

A: The writing in your article reflected a neutral point of view, I did not notice any bias in favor nor against the use of Daclatasvir. The article read like a typical Wikipedia topic and your group did a good job comprehensively covering and presenting the relevant information on the drug. I would also note that your citations seem a bit excessive at times (e.g. PK). Otherwise the article look good, great job! Dmochizuki (talk) 02:22, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Question 2 (Kay): Are the points included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely accessible? Yes, I have verified that all citations were freely accessible full-text articles. Ktakamura (talk) 09:04, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Question 3: I do not see any signs of plagiarism. It appears to be a summary using the authors' own words. Lcsmith1 (talk) 22:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)