Talk:Daredevil season 1

Image for the article
Based on the recent edits, figured I'd start a section here so we can discuss and not edit war. I do believe the non-uniformed image should be the one to use, as it was the promotional image used online, and the ad is used on transportation in major cities. We should also wait for to see what the home media release uses, as that should be the one the article uses. And that may well end up being the non-uniformed one. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:28, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The Netflix itself is using the uniformed image and the promotional material is circulating in major cities because its purpose is to promote, but that doesn't mean we should use it here once we had the final poster. Plus I highly doubt the home media would be with a promotional poster rather than the final one, used on Netflix. FYI, this is a Netflix series we are talking about. Thanks - Artmanha (talk) 04:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You are acting as if the poster released by Netflix for promotion does not come from Netflix, which is clearly ridiculous. We always use the official promotional poster for the season (see the Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. pages) until we know what the home media art will look like. If it turns out that the uniformed image is used for the home media, then we can change it, but for now this is the most appropriate image. Also, this image has been used on Netflix itself as well. - adamstom97 (talk) 07:14, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * No, we used in Agents of SHIELD the official final poster. The promotional one had only the SHIELD symbol and not one character on it (see it here). Same as season 2. As so the home releases came with the final poster on it, not the "promotional" one. Besides, what's better than using the same poster that Netflix is using? You are just trying to get things the way you want them to be, using false arguments and I won't fight with you. So by all means, suit yourself. - Artmanha (talk) 15:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Budget & Tax Credit info
[User:Adamstom.97] the issue mentioned by Tenebrae has been resolved. Please see his talk page, where I mention to him that I was going to restore the information. The info re: the tax credit is, and always was, factual information from a RS. I am reverting your last edit, if you don't mind. Depauldem (talk) 21:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Could you please provide a link to this discussion? - adamstom97 (talk) 22:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The issue was never about not including tax credit information. It involved what budget info should go in the infobox for film.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Infobox_film  I am reverting again.  The information is correct and from an RS. Please stop removing it.  Depauldem (talk) 23:06, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * my bad, you no need for reverting. I mistakenly thought you did.  Apologies. Depauldem (talk) 23:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)