Talk:David S. Bredt

Simulfilam section
Right now, what I'm reading in the final section really does not fit what i'd expect for a Wikipedia article.

I've removed the last two sentences as they uncited and bordered on defamatory, but I'd love a more experienced wikipedian to take a look on how to improve and clean it up to fit an encyclopedic tone, or a least discuss how it can be reworded to be more neutral.

I might also suggest locking until the Cassava Sciences stuff is cleared up, as I gather this is a controversial topic. Baahorn (talk) 01:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)