Talk:DeepPeep

Untitled
Admin note: Article was restored per editor's request. A tag was placed on behalf of the editor to give him some time to work on it. -- Alexf(talk) 19:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I have made an addition or two, hopefully enough for now to at least avoid another speedy. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:46, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Site is down — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.67.8.51 (talk) 20:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Site Is Gone
As of 2012 (probably a for a year or so now), the website appears to be dead, domain and all. It appears to be thoroughly dead. LiamSP (talk) 02:16, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * you should have been there. The room was dimly lit due to a thunderstorm taking out a nearby power line. They decided to close it behind closed doors. Some lecturers recommended it stay up or the tech sold on. But it never was. What a shame. Only 8 people were in the room during that decision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.231.142 (talk) 13:10, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

The site went too deep and fell into the deep web itself. That's what happens when you stand on the precipice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.231.228.184 (talk) 06:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on DeepPeep. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090225124700/http://www.deeppeep.org:80/ to http://www.deeppeep.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on DeepPeep. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707003227/http://www.nachrichten.ch/detail/373727.htm to http://www.nachrichten.ch/detail/373727.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707071035/http://tech.92jn.com/net/200903/1968.html to http://tech.92jn.com/net/200903/1968.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ilmessaggero.it/articolo.php?id=47843&amp;sez=HOME_SCIENZA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:48, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Subjective section...
As you may have noticed, I removed the section of this article titled "Advantages". That's because the entire thing contains extremely subjective materials, which aren't acceptable on Wikipedia. Perhaps a rewording of the section and/or title change could help. You let me know.--Neateditor123 (talk) 17:59, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123