Talk:Degarelix

FSH receptors in other solid tumors
Just to be clear, this section is logical, and the article it cites in NEJM is good science, but the unstated but reasonable conclusion that "somebody" thinks degarelix may have wider applicability is entirely speculative. I edited several fact errors and also adjusted the style somewhat. I find the NEJM article fascinating and under WP:IAR I think it enhances WP, but the literalist reality is that this material doesn't conform to WP:MEDRS, and would benefit from a good secondary source citation to back it up. FeatherPluma (talk) 05:43, 9 August 2011 (UTC)