Talk:Destination: Imagination/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  The left orium  16:29, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

I've done some edits to the article and it looks good (although I think the plot section is a bit too big and the reception section is a bit too small). The only thing that keeps me from passing the article is the infobox image. The fair-use rationale is really weak and I'm not sure it meets the non-free content criteria.  The left orium  16:20, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I strengthened the rationale, it should be good now.  The Flash  {talk} 19:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * A bit small but comprehensive enough for GA.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Congrats!  The left orium  20:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! :)  The Flash  {talk} 20:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)