Talk:Diane Jenkins

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Copyright problem removed[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FIRST APPEARANCE[edit]

DOES ANYONE KNOW THE PERSISE DAT DIANE JENKINS FIRST APPEAERD 204.48.1.5 (talk) 00:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First off, turn off the caps. Second of all, you're going to do this ALL OVER AGAIN?! Stop trying to create drama/conflict with every single article. Please STOP. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 01:14, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious204.48.1.5 (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any source proofing that Diane appeared in May, 1982?204.48.1.190 (talk) 19:04, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Soap Central[edit]

I was just wondering why this fansite has come into usage in the article. Would it be possible to find some alternatives?Rain the 1 20:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:SOAPS, Soapcentral.com can be used for news purposes. Plus, Dan gets his news stories from the same sources as everyone else, his news postings are creditable. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 20:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where does it say that at WP:SOAPS? I know there was once a conversation about which soapy sites were suitable, but I wasn't aware news stories were approved.Rain the 1 20:51, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to what I've been told, WP:RSN have deemed it acceptable for news resources, just not plot purposes. It may also be used for interview purposes, etc. It may not be used for plot purposes since fans are generally the ones to upgrade those. But anything posted by Dan himself, or one of his colleagues are deemed acceptable for new-postings. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 21:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is so special about Dan? If you come across any better sources, like newspapers etc - You'll replace them?Rain the 1 22:33, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just hate how people assume the whole site is a sham and unreliable when it isn't. If I do come across anything else, I'll go in and replace it, etc. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 23:46, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]