Talk:Dmitri Polyakov

Clarification
"Bagley says Ames did not betray him, because he only knew about Polyakov's activities when he was working with the FBI, when he was still acting as a Soviet plant."

Very confusing sentence. This is the first and only mention of "bagley", who appears to be an author. Either introduce him (or better) rewrite in a way that explains why bagleys opinion matters. Also the structure of the sentence...i still don't understand. 'He only knew'.."he was working"..."he was still"..(which he?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:D:CF00:16F:18EA:6832:80AE:4A7A (talk) 18:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 13:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Year of death comment
Death is shown as 1988 but the opening paragraph says he was executed in 1986. 2601:46:4400:720:55C2:836C:61EB:CE9F (talk) 01:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 02:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)