Talk:Docs.com

Again, seriously?
So far today I've been adding a plethora (over abundance) of sources, citations, and references to a lot of Microsoft related articles and this is a recent article so to some extend I can forgive this, but A LOT of Microsoft articles had no sources and please, please to whomever wrote this when you create a new article please provide third party sources to verify the information, I know that Docs.com is notable because I've seen it mentioned in more than a hundred newspapers, is it really so hard to just add one of them to the references? This article is a stub concerning a recently announced feature so I can excuse its size, but why do so many people keep forgetting to add references to the content? Please add references (I will do it now, but in the future when you write something, cite something). --Hoang the Hoangest (talk) 05:35, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Please do not confuse "updating" with removing content.
A common trend I've noticed with a lot of editors is whenever a piece of software is discontinued they will almost immediately remove and/or blank any related content, this is not what Wikipedia is about and this is harmful to the quality of both the content and the encyclopedia in general, so please refrain from "updating" articles by merely removing any notable and relevant historical content, I've spent a lot of time reverting trolls... I mean misguided editors who have removed a lot of content due to this "justification" and I ask of those editing this article, please do not remove the Facebook related content, I thought that this article was new as it looked like a bare stub with no references and just an introduction only afterwards realizing that an editor before completely blanked the original Docs.com article, I will assume this as good faith, but please do not delete content for it simply being not being something that applies to the software today. --Hoang the Hoangest (talk) 09:10, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Docs.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100711063548/http://docs.com/1JIQ to http://docs.com/1JIQ
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100711073016/http://docs.com/1JUK to http://docs.com/1JUK

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)