Talk:Dorsal veins of the penis

Merge proposal
Superficial dorsal vein of the penis and Deep dorsal vein of the penis are short articles with a good amount of overlapping imagery and information. I don't think there is a lot more that can be said about them individually, so I propose merging them into a single article covering both. bd2412 T 02:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose merge. To some audiences, the importance between these veins is very important, even if the articles about them are so far only minimally developed. --Arcadian (talk) 04:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * How much more developed can they possibly get? We can at least merge until there is enough material on each to sustain an article of respectable size. bd2412  T 04:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

I agree the differences can be discussed in the article and when the time comes individual articles can be developed, but this one is a tiny stub, it may help to join it with a larger article.

Kateweb (talk) 05:12, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Images inappropriate
Since this is an article on human anatomy, shouldn't the images we use be of penises that have not been modified by surgery?
 * Not if the circumcision makes the veins easier to see. (P.S. Use ~ to sign your posts on talk pages.)  Jwoodward48wiki (talk) 22:00, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * 2011 08 08 PVS Fig5 Clinic Brochure.jpg

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * 2011 08 08 PVS Fig5 Clinic Brochure.jpg