Talk:Duophonic

delaying the left and the right signals by means of delay lines and other circuits, desynchronizing the two channels by fractions of a second
These two statements mean the same thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 07:54, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Accidentally or not?
Quote from the article:

...and wound up getting "accidentally" reissued on CD throughout the 1980s and 1990s.

Why was "accidentally" enclosed within quotes? Are those scare quotes? Was it an intentional act that someone tried to pass as an accident? Please clarify.Devil Master (talk) 18:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Removed the "accidentally" as it seemed contentious and the sentence made sense without it. Took 2 1/2 years for someone to notice this message and act on it but better late than never. :P --Danjewell (talk) 03:11, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Haas effect
also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedence_effect — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.49.165.87 (talk) 23:45, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Fake stereo vs Duophonic
The fake stereo article redirects to Duophonic, while Duophonic is Capitol Records' name for their fake stereo process. Why isn't it that Fake stereo is the main page on this topic and Duophonic redirects to it? 66.67.112.2 (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)