Talk:Dutton/Dunwich

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 10:31, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Dutton/Dunwich, Ontario → Dutton/Dunwich –
 * No need for disambiguation. Unique name. P 1 9 9 • TALK 12:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Contesting - aren't all locales disambiguated regardless of the need? - UtherSRG (talk) 16:47, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Far from it. Do a quick search and you'll see that is not the case. Also see WP:CANSTYLE. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:58, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I support the removal of "Onatario" per WP:CANSTYLE, but why does the article use a slash? Just having a quick search, most of the sources I found used "Dutton-Dunwich". Jenks24 (talk) 03:30, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm seeing the slash, at least here . --Born2cycle (talk) 06:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Both the municipality itself and Statistics Canada use the slash. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 20:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, moving to full support. Jenks24 (talk) 07:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support. Remove unnecessary disambiguation.  --Born2cycle (talk) 06:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: the current name is not a disambiguation, it's a placename, statename type of name. HandsomeFella (talk) 13:11, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It is disambiguation for a Canadian place, where standard practice is to just use the placename as long as it's unambiguous. Jenks24 (talk) 07:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.