Talk:Dzüko Valley

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dzükou Valley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222151433/http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/detailsnew.asp?id=apr0415%2Foth054 to http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/detailsnew.asp?id=apr0415%2Foth054

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Real Ownership
Which state Dzuko Valley belongs to? Manipur or Nagaland?? There is a confusion in our mind that whether Manipur is the real ownership of Dzuko Valley or not. Purna Oinam (talk) 04:56, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I saw a couple of edit warring happening in the article regarding the ownership of the valley. To be noted, it is owned by both the states, Manipur & Nagaland. I have added enough reliable sources to verify the claim. I hope this will solve the problem. --Haoreima (talk) 08:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you make your claim by google map it's very. Google is just an imaginary line. After Dziikou is Long Kilometres streches That is Kezoltsa Forest which share boundary with Marram Khullen & Willong etc from Manipur side. So it's technically Wrong. Google India is introduced in 2007 & started in 2008 only & is still improving. Google is just an imaginary line.￼ Sahovi Phinyo (talk) 18:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Please discuss whatever you feel wrong at the talk page before reverting unexplained and undiscussed repeatedly. It's WP:vandalism. --Haoreima (talk) 16:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Is RFC suitable?
Sir! I am really afraid that that user (as he's temporarily blocked) will revert and remove the sourced contents again. To avoid such, may I start an RFC to bring consensus of multiple editors regarding the present format of the article? Additionally, please check if there's anything unsuitable or improper in the article! Thanks! --Haoreima (talk) 18:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC)


 * First: I wrote at the ANEW page that if TAE resumes such behavior after the block, that I would endorse another admin imposing a long partial block on them from the article (As I said, I would love to have the ability to layer a short sitewide block over a longer partial block, and a proposal I made for that at this year's Community Wishlist got a lot of support, but we can't do it yet so I have to choose one or the other).
 * As for bringing in outside editors, by all means do it. You may wish to consider the dispute resolution noticeboard or maybe start a discussion on the India noticeboard if you want informed contributions. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)