Talk:Ear print analysis

Addition of new subheadings (to be added)
Ciararryan (talk) 06:27, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Description
 * History
 * FearID
 * Limitations
 * Use in court
 * Future possibilities

Sources to be used for new information
Alberink, I., Ruifrok, A. (2007). Performance of the FearID earprint identification system. Forensic Science International, 166(2-3), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.001 Arcautea.M and Granell. J University of Valladolid Spain (2006) Ear Print as an Identification Method. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 57(7), 329-32. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c949/8bc14eacb0ecb5f6480e07c036271d9ca649.pdf Champod, I., Evett, I., Kuchler, B. (2001). Earmarks as evidence: a critical review. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46(6), 1275–1284. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS15146J Swift, B., Rutty, G. (2003). The human ear: its role in forensic practice. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 48(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2002251 Meijerman, L., Sholl, S., De Conti, F., Giacon, M., van Der Lugt, C., Drusini, A., Maat, G. (2004). Exploratory study on classification and individualisation of earprints. Forensic Science International, 140(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.10.024 Meijerman, L., Thean, A., Maat, G. (2005). Earprints in forensic investigations. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 1(4), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1385/FSMP:1:4:247 Junod, S., Pasquier, J., Champod, C. (2012). The development of an automatic recognition system for earmark and earprint comparisons. Forensic Science International, 222(1-3), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.05.021 Ciararryan (talk) 06:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Citation Needed
This sentence was in the description but needs a source.

Ear print analysis is considered to be more economical than DNA profiling, and is considered to be reliable because it is unlikely a technician would leave an ear print behind in a crime scene.

It was deleted from page.

Ciararryan (talk) 08:14, 28 May 2020 (UTC)