Talk:Easter Sunday Raid

Edits
Edited some extremely poor grammar and spelling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.56.180.7 (talk) 20:27, 19th May 2008 (UTC)

Removed the statement that the continued existence of the British Eastern Fleet was the first Japanese disaster of the war. It can be argued that the parts left UNTOUCHED at Pearl Harbor (the carriers, submarines, and oil storage tanks) were the first Japanese disaster of the war. And yes, I realize Enterprise and the other flattops weren't present. And that it would be a while before the submarines got a stranglehold on Japanese shipping. I can accept the argument that the Eastern Fleet prevented, for the first time in the war, the Japanese fleet from achieving their goal, but IMO its existence was hardly a disaster for the Japanese. --WeeWillieWiki (talk) 01:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Stats missing
Hi Wikipedians, I noticed that the infobox is missing stats on opposed forces numbers and key units, ships on both sides, and casualties. Can anyone please help provide these? I do not have access to the sources cited and listed. Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 00:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Easter Sunday Raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927112028/http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/second_world_war/volume.asp?levelID=67911 to http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/second_world_war/volume.asp?levelID=67911

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:40, 16 September 2017 (UTC)