Talk:Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth

Central Planning
von Mises argument is not from calculation but from planning, central planning. Thus, Cockshott's and Caplan's criticisms collapse into a heap of burned kindling. The final disintegrated cinder is the reference to Turing.

Turing's claim was not as stated on the film based on his life that a computer can be "like a brain". His claim is, a computer can be the same as the brain. These are 2 counts against the neurological argument - and that is what the case is - one day there will be a computer that does what Turing claimed will be but, best of all, will super-cede many brains.

To say that Turing meant many brains in one brain to deal with only economics (the claim entails that force) adds more nonsense to the stinking dung piled up by and since Turing, as brilliant as he was.

On economics, Caplan and Cockshott compound Turing's nonsense by appealing to trivia.

The crunch is, central planning is impossible. Attempts to impose central planning entails economic destitution for millions and rests on totalitarianism to impose it. I am acquainted with professors who quit the assumptions of socialism, and the myth of perfect competition and Keynesian poison, because they, independently, drew the same conclusions. 1.145.161.117 (talk) 14:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Central Planning is impossible
s 1.145.161.117 (talk) 15:08, 1 April 2023 (UTC)