Talk:Economic and Political Weekly

Peer-reviewed?
Dos it fulfill Wikipedia's definition of academic journal? Fgnievinski (talk) 04:13, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * This is a strangely complicated question to answer; how do you find a reliable source about a reliable source, from a country where such things are harder to come by in the first place? this seems to suggest that yes, it does. this makes it seem less certain, but still mentions that scholarship is published in it. I have personally used such scholarly work as sources on Wikipedia many times over; mainstream academics, even from the west, publish in it once in a while. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:26, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * "adequate time has to be provided for internal reading and external refereeing. It can therefore take up to four months for a final decision on whether the paper for the Special Article section is accepted for publication." . So, I think the answer is yes. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:37, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * At WP:WikiProject Academic Journals, we normally accept self-declared peer review at face value. Fgnievinski (talk) 22:02, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Seems clear enough to me and no indications to the contrary, I have modified the article accordingly. --Randykitty (talk) 17:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Economic and Political Weekly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140116072553/http://www.pragoti.in/node/3103 to http://www.pragoti.in/node/3103

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)