Talk:Economic liberalisation in Pakistan

Requested move 2 October 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Speedy moved, uncontroversial reversal of an undiscussed move by a sock (non-admin closure) – Thjarkur (talk) 18:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Economic Liberalization in Pakistan → Economic liberalisation in Pakistan – Because this article is written in Pakistani English given Strong national ties to the country, this article should be written according to Pakistani English convention per WP:ENGVAR, which almost all of them are similar to British spelling with local twist such as colour, realise, analyse, travelled, crore, etc. Both "ize" and "ise" are used in Pakistan and its Commonwealth of Nations countries but "ise" is predominant spelling in all these countries except in Canada, where "ize" is more dominant. This argument also applies before in Privatisation in Australia talk page, which originally titled "Privatization" then the article changed to "Privatisation" given that Australian spelling conventions that mostly similar to British counterpart (with exception of Program). In other side, "Economic Liberalization" seems be gramatically incorrect and the correct title should be "Economic liberalization" or "Economic liberalisation" because the second word (liberalization/liberalisation) should be lowercase after the first word. This article originally named as that (Economic liberalisation in Pakistan) before a sockpuppet named Sulaymān Hercules move the page to (Economic Liberalization in Pakistan), which it is incorrect title. 180.241.205.155 (talk) 13:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support Obviously, not sure why it was moved without discussion in the first place blindlynx (talk) 14:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support, per above.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 14:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support. This seems non-controversial. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.