Talk:Edna Beilenson

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) it was written from scratch, carefully and copiously cited, and its information derived from many, many different sources. One of the pages referenced was the blog page cited as the source of potential a copyright infringement. While it also quotes from one of the places that I quoted from, so do many other sources. I thought it was better to cite the original source of the quote, because I quoted a longer part of the passage. Otherwise, I really do not understand why all this information that is useful and has been assembled from so many different, notable sources might be speedily and summarily deleted. --Unionpearl (talk) 20:50, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Undoubtedly & unquestionably, this is my bad; an error on my end for tagging it as copyvio! I come across A LOT of articles which violate copyright guidelines and this one too got caught up amidst that, just hadn't noticed it was a quote which threw the error. My apologies & appreciate your understanding towards the same. Thanks. TopCipher (talk) 20:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for understanding & reinstating. --Unionpearl (talk) 21:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Needed incoming link
Would you consider a redirect link for searches for Peter Pauper Press to land here? I only found this page indirectly, and it is the one place where good info on the Press is to be found on Wikipedia. Susie Brooke (talk) 16:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)