Talk:Eduard Imhof

Untitled
This seems like a nice stub -- but (and I know this sounds stupid) it needs more! Naturally, all stubs need more. But in this case, if I didn't know better, I'd assume this was a vanity page. If the subject weren't already long-dead, this would be suspect: "His fame, which extends far beyond the Institute...," a picture of his signature, and that's it? Even a stub should have a little bit more to justify why this subject merits inclusion. I guess all I'm saying is that I'd rather the work/effort that went into reproducing his autograph here have rather gone into generating a paragraph or two on why he's so notable. If we have time to find, scan, and include graphics, why don't we have time to write more than two sentences on a subject?

Note: This stub has been around since August 2005. 66.17.118.207 13:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Eduard Imhof. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927221002/http://www.rgs.org/NR/rdonlyres/C5962519-882A-4C67-803D-0037308C756D/0/GoldMedallists18322011.pdf to http://www.rgs.org/NR/rdonlyres/C5962519-882A-4C67-803D-0037308C756D/0/GoldMedallists18322011.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:37, 20 December 2016 (UTC)