Talk:Ein Zivan

Banned
I reverted drorks edits since he is banned and has no right to do any edits at any article and his edits also removes that this Israeli settlements is an Israeli settlement. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Unexplained removal
I reverted Poliocretes edit where he removed the Israeli settlement in the lead and cat, and the link to Israeli-occupied territories in see also section as they are all relevant and no explanation was given for removing them. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Status sentence
There has been long discussion at WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration/Current Article Issues about adding the illegality issue in all settlement article: There is now consensus to have the sentence: "The international community considers Israeli settlements in (the Golan Heights/the West Bank/East Jerusalem) illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this." in all relevant articles, but its not clear yet exactly where in the article, I have tried to open up a discussion at IPCCAI: but I haven't gotten any replies to my latest posts. So now I'm just adding the sentence as I had explained at the IPCCAI discussion. If someone disagrees with the placement then we can discuss this. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 19:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I suggest you keep it to the centralized discussion instead of copy-pasting over a potential 200+ talk pages. --Shuki (talk) 23:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Jew-baiting is great fun, isn't it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.148.20 (talk) 21:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)