Talk:Eldfell/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

I'll place issues in the template below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality: - not too bad. Didn't look closely due to other issues.
 * Manual of Style compliance: - Further reading section should be reviewed and some material used for referencing etc.

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources: - not checked due to the scarcity of refs
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required: - about 75% of the article's prose is unreferenced
 * No original research: - who knows until referencing fixed

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - referencing needs finishing before this is brought back. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)