Talk:Electa Johnson

Untitled
Some spelling and grammar errors, no photos. Good content. Seth4404 (talk) 15:20, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review
The information is organized and flows nicely. The only problem I had was a few grammar mistakes (spell check, misused words,etc). Cowbell3000 (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

peer review
Your page is well designed, it just needs some pictures to make it pop.

There are a few grammatical errors, that should be fixed. copy paste your text into Microsoft word, that should help you with grammar and spelling

you guys need to have references

Kevmoe (talk) 15:34, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review
1. Looking good with the word content. I see that there is at least 1,000 words here, reaching the criteria minimum. Lead paragraph could use some work and some grammatical fixing. Good amounts of sections, but I couldn't find the citations. Citations are a must on Wikipedia especially due to credibility. Uh oh. Also missing pictures! Get on that if possible.

2. There are no references to talk about yet. This hurts the credibility of your page and overall look as well.

3. It all seems factual, unbiased, and flows well. Could use some more attention on lead section though. Good work fellas, and keep moving ahead.

Thill593 (talk) 15:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Tyler Hill

Peer Review
This is very well written and flow very easily. The only thing I can think of is you may want to add a pic or two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdowell92 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Thill593 (talk) 15:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Tyler Hill

Peer Review
Overall it is a good start for a page. The are some grammatical errors and no picture. Thomasbeeson (talk) 15:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review
Completeness:

500 words per person: Looks like you guys need to add a little more content. Lead Paragraph: Your lead paragraph is pretty weak. I am not sure if this is due to lack of available content or it is just not finished yet. 4 Sections of content: Your other section of content seem pretty strong and meet the requirements. Minimum amount of citations: It is hard to tell if you have the correct type of sources included in your article. You should check to make sure the two types of citations for each are strong. Images: There are no images uploaded at this time.

Evaluation of Resources:

Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority?: They seem to be of decent merit but again should be reviewed and put in a separate references section. Are the sources listed in the References of accurate? : They seem to be of decent merit but again should be reviewed and put in a separate references section. Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while articles or just easily available articles?: It seems that many are from the same publisher and there is not a wide variety of sources.

Readability & Content:

Is the information being presented factual in nature? It is factual, however, it does not sound as though it is written in a very academic format. Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias) Yes Does the article flow effectively? It flows well but the language could still be inproved Does the article feeling like it is missing content? It needs about 100 more words to meet the minimum requirements.

Concept12 (talk) 15:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Electa Johnson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://secure.thelog.com/news/newsview.asp?c=134817
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060602182131/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com:80/html/nationworld/2002109772_johnsonobit05.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002109772_johnsonobit05.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Electa Johnson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002109772_johnsonobit05.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070808180112/http://lamitopsail.org/fleet/johnsons.asp to http://www.lamitopsail.org/fleet/johnsons.asp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930014605/http://www.mysticseaport.org/library/manuscripts/coll/coll240/coll240.html to http://www.mysticseaport.org/library/manuscripts/coll/coll240/coll240.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:08, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at California Maritime Academy supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program&#32;during the 2012 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC)