Talk:Electric Ink

Shall we move the article?
As obnoxious as our mutual friend may be, he has a point of sorts. Should we move the article to Electric Ink (radio series) and leave the original title for the company? There are precedents for company articles as long as they don't rise to the level of advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djdaedalus (talk • contribs)


 * According to google, there are a bunch of tattoo studios called Electric Ink, too. None of these companies appear to be notable enough for an article of their own, and until that happens there is no need to disambiguate this article's title with a clarifying phrase in brackets. This is covered in the guidelines on article titles, here: WP:PRECISE. Squiddy | (squirt ink?)  07:23, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Good work. I vote for status quo as well.  Maybe our friend will get his privileges back, and follow the advice he's already been given. Djdaedalus (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2011 (UTC)