Talk:Electronic visual display

This article provides a well-funded comprehensive classification of the field of electronic visual displays which is a complex field of technoloy.

Which is the reason this article should be "cleaned up" ???

panjasan (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC)panjasan

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Electronic visual display. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060523001732/http://www.sipix.com/technology/epaper.html to http://www.sipix.com/technology/epaper.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100315092211/http://www.ntera.com/ to http://www.ntera.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

"Visual display unit" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Visual display unit and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 8 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 23:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Possible merge candidate (cross-posted here)
See flat-panel display, which I just cross-linked in the lead of both articles.

I'm going to propose this myself, since I'm a tumbleweed. It's far from clear how these two article intend to be dissected, if they remain distinct. Either clarity on this issue, or elimination of the duplication is a desired outcome. &mdash; MaxEnt 01:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)