Talk:Electroweak epoch

Citation needed for W and Z decay?
I don't agree that a citation is needed specifically for this. The lifetimes of the W and Z bosons is known to be short (see, for example, their individual articles); it's like requiring a citation for the statement "water is moist".216.70.243.82 (talk) 01:48, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Article is just plain wrong
The article claims the Higgs Boson (as if we knew there was only one of them, which we don't) has been "demonstrated". That is just simply false. The LHC has determined that a particle which MAY BE the Higgs Boson (or a Higgs Boson) exists at an energy of ~126 GeV/c². As of January 2017, work is on-going to confirm that this particle has the properties that a Higgs particle must have. Until there is more information all we can reasonably say it that this particle "may be" or "is consistent with being" the Higgs particle.40.142.190.212 (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Physical science
Print 49.145.0.170 (talk) 13:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)