Talk:Eliza Butler Kirkbride School

WikiProject NRHP assessment
It's been suggested that the current version of this article be reassessed according to the WikiProject NRHP quality scale. I've looked it over, and think that it's still a stub by those standards.

Per "More detailed criteria" at the quality scale, a start-class article includes "[a]t least one important aspect of the topic covered in reasonable detail". I don't think that either the treatment of architecture or that of history satisfies this criterion. The discussion of architecture consists of two sentences, and doesn't mention the interior at all. The discussion of history notes that the building was constructed in 1925–26, then jumps to the 1990s. We're told that the school was listed in the NRHP, but not why.

Although the article's longer than a typical stub, the incompleteness of the coverage of both architecture and history argues against giving it a higher ranking. — Ammodramus (talk) 12:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)