Talk:Elyse Sewell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

"Sewell has BAs in Biology and Spanish" - wouldn't it be a BA in Biology and Spanish?


Don't tease, what did she do that was the 15th most outrageous thing on TV? Bugloaf 19:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It was the 16th actually :P but yeah what was it? Leftist 16:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I think it had something to do with her saying that modeling is not 'mentally challenging.' [1][2]
I would have thought it was the profanity-laden rant she gave in the "confessional" about her competitors (the moment I fell in love with her, BTW =). I can't find a source for this "16th most outrageous" thing. Are we sure it's not the 80th "Craziest TV Moment"? Oh, and one more thing: how could she have modeled in Mademoiselle magazine when that article says the last issue was November 2001? - dcljr (talk) 03:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article should mentioned what was said - can someone add it, if they know what it was? - Matthew238 08:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone else think the quotes here are....well...they sort of reflect negatively on her, dont they? She says a lot of perceptive and contstructive things on her blog, which are often much wittier and contain far fewer expletives. Can someone maybe gather them up? --DaveyE 06:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps putting it in context would be better. Just reading the quote, one could come to think of her as a mean bitch, if they had not seen the show or her. Something about her views on modelling would also be good -07:26, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Sewell, not Elyse[edit]

Please note: If you're going to refer to the subject of this article by one name in the text, please use Sewell (following standard encyclopedia style), not Elyse. - dcljr (talk) 18:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boyfriend[edit]

"Sewell's boyfriend of six years is Martin Crandall from The Shins." - six years back from when? Something like "they have been dating since x" would be better. Should mention that he was in an episode of ANTM too. - Matthew238 04:58, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Her blog about the break-up says that they have been dating for 7 years. Since the relationship has stopped, I think it's safe to say they dated "... for 7 years until January 2008 when..." SonicTiff (talk) 09:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mademoiselle impossibility[edit]

I've finally removed the claim that she appeared in/on the magazine Mademoiselle, since that magazine went out of business a couple of years before she started modeling (see also my same objection in a previous comment above). I believe the original author of that "fact" (an anon user added it on June 17, 2005) might have been confusing it with a Hong Kong clothing line called Moiselle, but I haven't tried to verify this. - dcljr (talk) 01:53, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion[edit]

I have removed the deletion discussion message at the top of the article for the following reasons:

  • There had been no nominations for deletion. See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elyse Sewell
  • The person who added the tag did not follow all the steps for nominating an article for deletion, so the existence of the discussion was not logged. I believe that it was nominated for malicious purposes, and should be considered vandalism.

I do believe, however that we need to get together some references to justify the removal of the other banner message on the article.

kju 05:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sewell and Crandall Arrests[edit]

I believe there is an error in the description of their arrests.

They were both arrested on suspicion of domestic abuse but neither was formally charged with the crime.

From the OregionLive

The Sacramento County district attorney's office has declined to press charges against either Marty Crandall or Elyse Sewell, after both were arrested over the weekend on suspicion of domestic abuse.

source - http://www.oregonlive.com/music/index.ssf/2008/01/shins_crandall_sewell_not_char.html 66.108.132.187 (talk) 01:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elyse Sewell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elyse Sewell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elyse Sewell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]