Talk:Emily Winterburn

B-class assessment
I believe this article should be B-class. Here is my assessment:

-- AquaDTRS (talk) 20:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. ✅ Every sentence is referenced with a reliable source. None of the sentences are controversial.
 * 2) The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.  Notable works and a short biography is reasonably sufficient. May be missing a few bits of biographic information and a picture, but those have to be properly sourced.
 * 3) The article has a defined structure. ✅ Sections are clearly arranged.
 * 4) The article is reasonably well-written. ✅ Yes
 * 5) The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. ✅ There is an infobox with the sourced information. Diagrams are N/A.
 * 6) The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. ✅ Yes, not technical at all.