Talk:Emma Brooker

Should be redirected?
Having just noticed this page's creation and the similarities to the list entry (which I believe should be recorded somewhere), I'm not too sure whether this page should have been created (or not yet at least). One quick comparison displays that the only difference between the list entry and the article is the addition of an unreferenced "parental developments" section and some storylines. I am therefore proposing that this page be redirected back to the list entry. Unless an article achieves WP:GNG, it should not be created and since this has no expanded development, I strongly disagree that this deserves one. However, I thought it would be best to open a discussion on the talk page first. Soaper1234 - talk  22:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree. Perhaps the list entry could be expanded, as Emma is a great character, but certainly not a character that meets WP:GNG, unfortunately. – DarkGlow (talk) 22:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I think there is scope for the article to pass GNG. At the time of writing the article is poorly sourced, needs work and offers nothing that cannot be covered in the list entry. This is the problem, it was not created in the correct way.Rain the 1 20:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I definitely believe there is scope for the article, but without the appropriate work and effort being put into it, it should remain a list entry. Soaper1234 - talk  19:09, 13 December 2019 (UTC)