Talk:Emperor Murakami

How better to present these dates?
In the Kugyō section:

................................................... lifetime, 880-949 .... time in office (946-949) ........... Kampaku (946-949), Fujiwara no Tadahira (藤原忠平), 880-949

In the intial edit, I intended to present the dates during which someone held a specific court title, but that now seems too ambitious for a start-level article. The intention had been to explain the sequence of serial officeholders with these dates.
 * Kampaku, Fujiwara no Tadahira (藤原忠平), 946-949.
 * Daijō-daijin, Fujiwara no Tadahira (藤原忠平), 936-949.
 * Sadaijin, Fujiwara no Saneyori (藤原実頼), 947-967.
 * Udaijin, Fujiwara no Saneyori (藤原実頼), 946-947.
 * Udaijin, Fujiwara no Morosuke (藤原師輔), 947-955.
 * Udaijin, Fujiwara no Akitada　(藤原顕忠), 960-965
 * Udaijin, Minamoto no Taka-akira　(源高明), 966-967

Instead, it's probably better to simply list the birth/death dates. Arguably, it might be possible (or even preferable) to include both sets of dates as the information becomes available ...? --Ooperhoofd 14:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I won't be commenting on this specific case, but generally-speaking this kind of matter should be done in a very systematic manner, I think, because, I am assuming, that lists similar to this one may/should be added to other articles of emperors too. So, why don't you post something like to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Japan or other places. -- Taku 02:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Inconsistent birth year
Article introduction states birth year to be 924 but is categorized as 926 births. Which one is accurate? -- अभय नातू (talk) 03:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC)