Talk:Equestrian statue of Henry IV

Peer Review
Looks quite good so far, the structure of the article seems to be set up pretty nicely and you've got a good amount of sources. There's a neutral, factual tone to the whole thing, so that's good as well. One issue is the introductory section, it is a little long and goes into detail that would probably be better saved for another section, such as the visual description or the section about the recasting. The intro is meant to be sort of a quick overview, so just give the vital details, like when it was first made, what it's made of, who made it and when it was reforged. 2 or 3 sentences perhaps. One other minor thing, perhaps provide a link to the page on Harpies in the statue's description as not everyone might know what that is. Other than that, it looks like it's off to a good start. DSysteel (talk) 07:47, 4 April 2019 (UTC)