Talk:Eric Stuart

Bonsly?
Can somebody confirm that Eric Stuart played Bonsly in Movie 8? --PAK Man + 17:08, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Magikarp man/Totodile
Eric Stuart voiced both not Tony Anselmo - Totodile and Carlos Alzraqui - Magikrp salesman no no no no no no ! Who ever put that is vandilizing wikipedia and just might be block —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew Cantrell (talk • contribs) 04:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Singing career
I'm a fan of Eric Stuart but the whole intro, especially about his singing career, sounds like it was written by a rabid fan. There aren't any sources and it sounds very subjective. Here is an example, "Each of his albums has its own feel to it, but trademark features common to all include his unique ability to convey varied emotions with his voice, story-telling lyrics filled with rhetorical devices (clever and witty enough to stand on their own as poetry), and a meticulous attention to quality and minute detail in every note." Need I say more? 98.114.156.144 (talk) 04:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree Sparr (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Musician and singing career!
He has his own band and he is a musician, singer and a songwriter. Go look on his website! 2600:1000:B075:1BA9:1109:9E51:C4DD:9EB3 (talk) 23:10, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 November 2016
Cubix is missing from his filmography section. A user removed it a while back. Can someone please add it back please? It goes in the "non-anime" section. 2600:1000:B006:D1AE:999D:2239:2C41:F800 (talk) 13:56, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Not done: Banned users don't get to make edits. Sro23 (talk) 13:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Eric Stuart's resume
From its formatting and the information presented on certain entries, the body of information presented is clearly yanked from his IMDb page of years past, and the errors that were present then are being presented by him as facts now. It's... not ideal for a source, primary or otherwise, sad but true. To reiterate, I do not think his resume is worth citing unless it's citing the portions that are indeed factual, and if procceding in that manner is a problem, then perhaps the page should be rebuilt altogether around different, more chronologically relevant primarly sources. Please consider this argument in determining your future course of action. Thank you. Veritatem dilexi (talk) 00:30, 24 April 2017 (UTC)