Talk:Ernest Peterlin

Reliability in context for "show trial"
I have no doubt that the trial of Peterlin was conducted for political purposes, but the idea that he was not a collaborator because the trial was politically motivated is complete nonsense. He clearly collaborated with the enemy for an extended period of time against his own countrymen, in such a harsh manner to cause public outcry. Peterlin was not a cleric and was not prosecuted for being one, so a general dismissal (in a religious journal) of the Christmas trials as being staged political trials is hardly reliable in this context to support a description of him being subjected to a "show trial". You need a better source for this. Surely there is something in a judicial or human rights journal that can be used to support such a description. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:15, 8 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi. I do not object that he was a collaborator, but there is also no serious doubt that the process was a show trial. For the moment, this source should do. I will look for a better one. TadejM my talk 12:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)


 * A better source has been added. Happy now. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:54, 9 November 2022 (UTC)