Talk:Ernest van den Haag

Hopelessly Biased
The main writer of this cites primary source material for his tendentious inferences, and uses it in order to grind his ideological ax. I have no problem exploring Ernest van den Haag's views on civil rights, but to cast him as some sort of crypto-racist is patently absurd. Furthermore, the extrapolations made about neoconservatism have no bearing on this article, and are not backed up by any relevant citations. Not to mention the fact that the subject of this article was not a neoconservative.

Ruthfulbarbarity (talk) 22:47, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

I deleted the last couple of sentences from the section titled On Race Neutrality in U. S. Immigration Policy. Although I agreed with the person who wrote these sentences and I thought his or her points were interesting, these sentences clearly violated the Neutral Point of View. Perhaps someone can find a way to incorporate some of the points in these sentences into the article in a manner that is less ideologically partisan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.56.38.5 (talk) 05:17, 5 May 2014 (UTC)